DawZi wrote:why cant they just do i nice round figure of 6000 if needs be
haha,were talking about the council here,when do they do anything right

DawZi wrote:why cant they just do i nice round figure of 6000 if needs be
shrimpnsave wrote:DawZi wrote:why cant they just do i nice round figure of 6000 if needs be
haha,were talking about the council here,when do they do anything right
shrimpnsave wrote:haha,were talking about the council here,when do they do anything right
DawZi wrote:why cant they just do i nice round figure of 6000 if needs be
Christies Child wrote:campdave wrote:alwaysright wrote:So why might the new ground only have 3 parts to it, is it a funding problem, planning problem ???
Or no problem at all and just rumours and speculation?
Let's wait and see IF the amount of speculation concerning the stadium is that...pure speculation.
I wonder what you will say IF those who posted this info in the first place (take note that it wasn't me) are proved right.
![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests