Bryan wrote:Any manager is judged soley on results.
Hopefully, he'll recognise that what he's tried to do this season has been an abject failure, buffered entirely by two other clubs being worse
ezz wrote:The whole squad, staff and manager take the blame and priase for every performance. Sometimes a manager sets his stall perfect and players on the pitch let him down. Sometimes the manager gets tactcis wrong but players bail him out. Works both ways, but you've NEVER had a good thing to say about Sammy.
This is a manager who up until this season bettered his results year after year, that can only happen for so long. I saw a bad season coming a mile off because no way were we ever going to beat last seasons 4th, but if were still in the football league next season then what does it matter. We dont have the resources to go up, so if were not going down it doesn't matter where we finish as long as its not bottom 2. Infact the end to this season has been more exciting than most, now we have something to lose.
But even when we finished 4th you barely had a good word to say about Sammy, you let your personal issues with him cloud the fact that he's been the best manager at our club in recent history!
I was wondering when you would show up again, obviously nowhere to be seen when we won the last couple of games. Yep Sammy is an awful amanger that took a tin pot team to league 2 beat the best teams in the league and finished 1 place off auto promotion.
No pobble it is infact you who knows nothing, but Sammy is clueless and clearly knows nothing about football management. Maybe you should be manager.
Keith wrote:Bryan wrote:Any manager is judged soley on results.
Agreed, but how many?
The last 3 results?
The last 30 results?
The last 300 results?
Time is running out.
The style of play has never been pretty to watch.
There are clearly more than enough players who are with us for the pay-packet, who don't give a toss about the club.
BUT
If Sammy McIlroy's judged purely on "results", then he's done enough in the past to suggest that he should be given a bit longer. This season has been a long, poor one, interspersed with occasional flashes of mediocrity. However, it's where we go from here. Hopefully, he'll recognise that what he's tried to do this season has been an abject failure, buffered entirely by two other clubs being worse. Hopefully Sammy Mac will decide to start building a team for next season that is based around entertaining and playing people who actually want to wear the shirt. I'm still saying Sammy Mac deserves a bit longer, based upon his results over the last five seasons... but the time for change is getting closer... either on the pitch or off it.
Morectalk wrote:My point is that, yes, Sammy has done a good job over the years, but he can't take it any further and IMO he should go. Call it by mutual consent if you want, but he should leave with our thanks, and give someone else a go. I seem to remember that we all thought Harvey couldn't be replaced and we were proved wrong back then. If we play like that again on Saturday then Wycombe will win 6, 7, 8 nil, and it will be embarrassing to say the least.
ezz wrote:It's not just that, it was around January when people really started to want him gone. Sacking him in my opinion wouldn't have helped,as we'd have struggled to get a 'better' replacement. No point in getting rid of him for the hell of it, if we'd only bring in a manager who may have done even worse.
What you don't realise is that Sammy has had us punching above our weight for years now, we came up through the play-offs as we were 'strong' enough to win the conference outright. First season in the league was always giong to be ok as its classed as the honeymoon period, we finished mid table....great result.
goneshrimping wrote:What you don't realise is that Sammy has had us punching above our weight for years now, we came up through the play-offs as we were 'strong' enough to win the conference outright. First season in the league was always giong to be ok as its classed as the honeymoon period, we finished mid table....great result.
Please get that idea out of your head about "punching above our weight". Our budget given the rumoured wages and the agent fees we pay must be in the top 6 of this division, we lose money hand over fist that the directors write off out of their own pockets and to say that we have punched above our weight is quite simply false.
We don't know what our player budget is and we certainly don't know what the other teams in this league spend on their budget
ezz wrote:We have a small fan base, we have a small catchment area for players, we have a lower budget than 'most' clubs and we were not exactly a 'big' name in this league in terms of chance of winning things.
We have a small fan base, we have a small catchment area for players, we have a lower budget than 'most' clubs and we were not exactly a 'big' name in this league in terms of chance of winning things.
Therefore we are one of the smaller teams in this league, even when are attendances were in the 2000's thats still a lot lower than the majority of clubs attact.
We came up with a good team spirit and work rate and it works in a league like this, we've brought in my players who are supposed to have more 'quality', this may be true but we've lost the spirit and the work rate in the progress.
Anyone who doesn't think we're punching above our weight is seriously deluded.
Our wages may be high.....nobody knows but we only really sign players on loan and for free, very little do we ever pay a large transfer fee as we don't have the money.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 108 guests