AV Referendum - FAO Big Red Dog

Re: AV Referendum - FAO Big Red Dog

Postby Plain Peter » Thu May 05, 2011 11:27 am

We haven't got local elections where I am.
Just been to cast my NO vote.
The Polling staff were glad to see somebody actually bothering to vote :!:
Plain Peter
 

Re: AV Referendum - FAO Big Red Dog

Postby Heysham_Shrimp » Thu May 05, 2011 6:11 pm

Heinz wrote:We haven't got local elections where I am.
Just been to cast my NO vote.
The Polling staff were glad to see somebody actually bothering to vote :!:



just been to cast my NO vote in Heysham Central. quite a few of the electorate were at the polling station.

I saw another good reason why it should be a NO vote on TV - Eddie Izzard is recommending a yes vote :lol: :lol: :lol:
"They will be dancing in the streets of Total Network Solutions tonight" - Jeff Stelling
User avatar
Heysham_Shrimp
 
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:47 am

Re: AV Referendum - FAO Big Red Dog

Postby Plain Peter » Sat May 07, 2011 10:23 am

Heinz wrote:
marky wrote:It is a misleading graphic but then, so are the "She needs nurses, not a new voting system" style posters that have been the mainstay of the no campaign from the very start.


So what are we supposed to believe?
Both camps are spinning crap.
The lager/coffee graphic is stupid, inplausible, and insulting.
The only intelligent material I've seen are leaflets giving us the basics of AV.
I hope the turn-out is so low that the whole referendum is discredited.


£millions wasted.
58% (that's a fact) never bothered to vote for one reason or another, mainly apathy I expect.
Many of them (I'm guessing) are on benefits, and should be thankful to the last government for giving them a better standard of living than a lot of them deserve.
If I was Milliband I'd be trying to wake these people up.
Plain Peter
 

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 98 guests